|
Explaining Retaliation
to Children
|
By Adam Wilkenfeld
CWK Producer
|
|
|
|
|
They
say, like, 'don't punch, it's bad, it can hurt people.'"
-Joe, Age 12-
|
Many Americans are angry. A recent Gallup poll
says 88% of US citizens believe whoever attacked the World Trade
Center and Pentagon "should pay."
But 12-year-old Joe and his brother, Mitchell, may not understand
retaliation. That's because when one boy pushes the other,
their father-and society itself-says, "Don't strike back."
Richard Alterman, the boys' father, says, "I don't believe
that one brother should take revenge upon the other brother,
regardless of what happened."
On the news, children everywhere hear that American may retaliate
for the terrorist arracks. And yet, we teach our kids that
revenge is wrong. "They say, like, 'don't punch, it's
bad, it can hurt people.'"
"I think it does require a different level of explanation
to children," says clinical psychologist Dr. David Rush.
"As far as why are we doing this, and what purpose does
it serve, which is different from, 'don't hit your brother.'"
Punching your brother back is the wrong thing to do, but
American fighting back may be the right thing to do. How do
you explain this to your child? "It's confusing,"
Richard Alterman says. "And it's complicated."
Psychologists say we teach children to 'turn the other cheek,'
but we also teach them that there are consequences for their
actions. "Explain to them that sometimes if mom or dad
punishes them, that they get punished in different ways, "
Dr. Rush says. "And out government punishes people in
different ways as well."
"So there should always be consequences," Richard
Alterman says. "But revenge is never one of them."
|
|
|
By Tom Atwood
CWK Network
How children respond to the notion of 'retaliation' has actually
been studied, with results published in the Journal of Interpersonal
Violence. In 1993, researchers read stories with examples
of retaliation among children to fifty 9-year-old boys and
girls. Each story featured one child damaging another child's
property either accidentally or intentionally. The stories
also described various types of retaliation to the damage-either
physical, verbal, or property. Following each story the children
were asked to rate the "wrongfulness" of the second
child's retaliation. The results:
- Children rated retaliation against an "accidental"
act of aggression as more wrong than retaliation against
an "intentional" act.
- Property damage was judged to be the most wrongful form
of retaliation (as opposed to verbal or physical).
- Verbal and physical retaliation against younger siblings
were regarded as significantly more wrongful than against
older siblings and friends.
Researchers concluded, "Children are capable of making
subtle discriminations between intentional acts and accidental
acts when shaping their responses to perpetrators actions."
The study also suggests "children make subtle discriminations
between types of retaliation, and their relationship to the
perpetrators when shaping their response."
|
|
What Parents Can Do
|
How do we explain retaliation to children in terms of a response
to the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington on September
11? Clinical psychologist Dr. David Rush says retaliation
is "a common subject for children. They might not discuss
it, but they engage in it all the time."
When governments retaliate, "it can be confusing for
children," Dr. Rush says, "because we tell children
to 'turn the other cheek.'
"But I think you also need to explain to them that we're
talking about different types of events that have occurred,
and some events call for stronger and more stringent measures.
For example, you can explain to them that when they do something
wrong, and they are punished, there are different ways you
punish children...There are consequences if they hit their
sister, and obviously there are consequences if we are attacked
by terrorists."
|
|
A Non-Violent Response?
|
There are groups that say just as we teach our children not
to hit back, our government should not hit back, either. The
Institute for Peace and Justice (www.ipj-ppj.org)
says justice, not retaliation, should be the basis of any
response to the terrorist attacks. The Institute suggests
parents teach children to "escalate love" in the
face of escalating violence. How can children, and all of
us, "escalate love?" The Institute for Peace and
Justice offers this advice:
- Respect yourself and others.
In the face of escalating words of hate, we can escalate
our words of kindness toward others.
- Communicate better and listen
carefully. In the face of escalating anger, we can
escalate our willingness to listen non-defensively and acknowledge
the deep hurts and fears that underlie a lot of this anger,
and not respond in kind.
- Forgive. In the face of
escalating cries for revenge, we can escalate our willingness
to become more forgiving toward anyone with whom we have
some issues.
- Act courageously. In the
face of escalating acts of hate directed at Muslim and Arab
people and others, we can escalate our courage and stand
by them.
And when talking to children about the terrorist attacks,
experts agree that it is important to acknowledge the frightening
aspects of what has happened. According to the American Academy
of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, falsely minimizing the
danger will not end a child's concerns. Also, the way children
see and understand their parents' reaction is very important.
Parents should admit their own concerns to their children,
and also stress their abilities to cope with the situation.
The American Psychological Association also offers the following
advice for parents to help their children cope with traumatic
incidents like the attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.:
- Find out what the children's concerns are.
- If the children are concerned about their own safety,
discuss with them how to be safe. Ask them what they need
in order to feel safe. Have your children draw how they
feel safe.
- Help the children identify how they don't feel safe.
Try to find out what they are afraid of, instead of making
assumptions.
- Limit exposure to media presentations. Young children
and pre-teens cannot developmentally understand that kind
of information. They need help from parents and teachers
to understand.
|
|
Resources
|
John Templeton Foundation www.templeton.org
American Psychological Association www.apa.org
Dr. David Rush, Clinical Psychologist
Institute for Justice and Peace www.ipj-ppj.org
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry www.aacap.org
|
|
|
|
|